Responding to my own email... > On Oct 11, 2015, at 6:40 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ahh, > > Clearly it's much easier to get feedback on the website than to get people to > test :-) > > Is this an example of the bike shedding phenomenon? :-)
First things first. Me and my big mouth. What I should have said was "Thank you to all of you who provided feedback. Much appreciated. I need as many people as possible to look at this and help me iron out the kinks before the site goes live". > I'll try to answer to all of the comments here... > >> On Oct 10, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Rick Walsh <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I've had a quick look on my phone. Using Chrome on my Galaxy S6. I like the >> new layout, including that it draws attention to cool features at the top. A >> few points. >> -Main headings on each page are inconsistent size. Landing page is small. >> Downloads is large. FAQ is small, etc. >> > > Yes, I noticed that, too. The pages are two different ways - Landing and FAQ > use an additional toolset that the other pages don't use. I'll take a look at > how to make this consistent. I think I have now fixed most of them - I know there are a couple left that are a different size and black (see next item). If you stumble across them please point them out here so I don't end up missing any. >> -I think the heading colour would look better as "Subsurface blue", rather >> than black. >> > > Good point This should be fixed for most, see previous point. >> -On the landing page is it better to elaborate on the features in case the >> reader doesn't wait to scroll through them at the top? Cloud storage, >> platforms and the planner aren't mentioned except in the bit that flashes >> through at the top. >> > > I tried both ways and it felt really redundant. So I'm not sure what to do > here. I'll ask a friend of mine who has helped me with rewording this page > (and as working on writing a better announcement). She tends to know what > works with audiences :-) > What do people here think. I just added a German translation for the landing page and did that slightly differently - I'm not sure it's better, though. >> On Oct 10, 2015, at 11:22 PM, Salvador Cuñat <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Good morning. >> >> 2015-10-11 8:01 GMT+02:00 Dirk Hohndel <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> After about 20 hours of editing and copying and modifying I have a mockup of >> the new website ready. >> >> Please go to http://ssrftest.subsurface-divelog.org >> <http://ssrftest.subsurface-divelog.org/> and let me know what you think. >> >> >> It looks rather bizarre in my browser };-) > > > Yes, I kinda mentioned that but should have said it more strongly... > a) the site automatically follows the language settings of your browser - so > if you usually browse the web in Spanish (or German) it will show you that > translation (which hopefully means less need for the language switching) > b) while I spent a ton of time migrating a good chunk of the translations, > the landing page and the dive ramblings page and most of the posts are broken > with respect to translations > But many other pages should do the right thing, e.g. the FAQ or the Downloads > page (except that I believe I have some changed to the non-existend 4.5 and > some are the old text). Which reminds me, I noticed that the translations are > WAY out of sync for some of the pages. As everything else we do, this is all > a matter of the right people having enough time. Where the "right people" way > to often ends up being "me". So I think with the exception of the landing page and many of the older news items all the translations should now be cleaned up. I'll send a separate email about web site translations in a moment. >> On Oct 10, 2015, at 11:34 PM, Steve <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Looks good on my laptop. >> I would change the different languages bar to the top rather than at the >> bottom which you need to scroll down before you see it from the homepage. > > > Well, it's at the bottom on purpose because as I mentioned above, most people > should never need it and having it on the top means it steals important > vertical space when you first open the page. So I think I'll leave it on the > bottom. I left it at the bottom but moved it up above the footer with the social media icons. It now gets correctly resized / wrapped if the window is too narrow. >> On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:02 AM, Gaetan Bisson <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> The only thing I noted is that we have two redundant social media >> banners (one in "top-header" and the other in "footer-bottom"); perhaps >> the top one could be removed so page contents get bumped up? > > > Oh, good catch - I thought I had disabled the top one (see comments above > about not wasting vertical space at the top). Yes, I just want the ones in > the footer. Fixed. >> On Oct 11, 2015, at 2:18 AM, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >> Adding a few thing to what the others have said. >> >> The lefthand navigation frame goes all the way to the bottom of the page and >> thus covers the language row with the result that only “sh” from English is >> visible. >> It is really apparent on the bugtracker page. > > Oh, oops - that one is supposed to "flow", i.e. to wrap around and become > multiple lines. I need to figure out why it doesn't do that Fixed. >> I suggest that the command snippets get placed in a scrollable frame, >> otherwise the page gets disproportionally wide when viewed on a phone > > Also a very good idea. I need to figure out how to do that - can't be that > hard since I see it on many pages. Still on my todo list. > OK, I think that responds to all of your comments. > > Thanks everyone for trying things - I realize it's still a little rough but > I'll admit that I'm quite excited about it. Needless to say I think this is a > massive improvement compared to what we had before - which looked terrible on > mobile browsers and was way too cluttered. We had a couple people look at the > site while in Bonaire and the responses were generally quite negative. The > reality is that a lot of people consume the web on iPads and not on desktops > and that changes some of the underlying ideas of what you can show and how > you should show it. Less visual clutter is the main goal here... Now that most issues are addressed, please play with the new site some more. I'm sure there are more inconsistencies that need to be addressed. Separate email about translations coming up :-) /D
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
