On 12 October, 2015 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:16:09PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > On 12 Oct 2015, at 16:36, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > But still a upper limit of the TTS is anyhow a good idea. > > > I'll clobber up a patch for that unless someone else beats me to it. > > > > > > > here is my attempt at that. > > > > This displays the TTS as 121 minutes for the maximum. Changing this for a > > string like „TTS: long“ would of course introduce a new string so I left it > > out. To be added later. > > I think "TTS > 120min" would be much preferrable. >
For the TTS I think its really important to be clear that its somewhere above that number. For the ndl calculations it really didn't matter that it was capped at 120min, because a NDL of 120 min means just "LOTS", but a TTS you really need to be clear that its bigger than X. But when clearing up that TTS is > 120 we should do the same for NDL. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
