> I took a very quick glance at the AppImage, and noticed that if you > strip the subsurface binary, you can shave off some of the size.
You are right; I assume there are even more ways to optimize for size (e.g., compile dependencies with only the capabilities that we really need; check whether all files contained in the AppImage are actually needed). > You also seem to have subsurface binary there twice > (under usr/bin and usr/lib) That was a mistake, changed the recipe at https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/blob/master/recipes/subsurface.sh > I suppose we should need to multiply that by two, one AppImage for > 32bit and second for 64 bit systems. Correct. The hardest part will be to figure out how to do this on a 64-bit build host like the ones I am using on travis-ci. Pull requests welcome. _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
