I was not proposing to do so. I guessed that the argument has already been discussed and I was curious about the issues.
BUT, I don't agree that it would complexify. No more linked lists. Just queries. It would be (have been) far simpler. 2015-10-18 16:58 GMT+02:00 Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]>: > > Em 18 de out de 2015 12:02, "Giorgio Marzano" <[email protected]> > escreveu: > > > > Just out of curiosity, > > > > I am not an SQL guy, but it seems to me that subsurface is the typical > application which would benefit greatly using a DBMS to store data and > relations. It would simplify a lot data handling and storage. > > It would greatly complexify the data handling and storage - did you took a > look on how the git remote file works, in comparison of how a database > would work? > > Also, a database is usually a complex file - it's a binary and very hard > for a human yo read it or modify by hand to test stuff. > > A no-no from me. > > > > > Is this opportunity ever been take in account? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > subsurface mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface > > >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
