On 9 November 2015 at 23:23, Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-June/022090.html
>>
>> CopperSpice is Qt fork discussed in the above thread:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIiwBNvTllk
>>
>> i'm quickly skipping trough it ATM.
>> these CopperSpice people give an interesting talk about open source,
>> moc, Qt contribution licensing.
>> they do use strictly C++11 though.
>
>
>
> There was a lengthy e-mail exchange between CopperSpice and Qt, and thiago's
> answers made me stick with Qt side.
>

links? is it in that same thread?

lubomir
--

disclaimer: i'm not really suggesting a switch or anything...
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to