Hi, > On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:08, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > And then we turn building it off by default and no one gets it, or we turn > it on by default, and we added the same dependencies to building the > Subsurface package. I guess that's my point. I wonder if this wouldn't be > better off being its own project, with its own repository, its own > releases, its own builds, etc.
how often will this really be used? I would say O(1) times by users that transition from the old Smartrak software to subsurface. Why don’t we offer this as a web service (if you want I could run this on my server) where you upload a .sgl file and get a .ssrf file back. In this case, we don’t have to provide ten thousands different builds, just one that runs on the server. What do you think? Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
