On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 09:34:20PM +0000, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Monday, November 16, 2015 07:08:04 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 04:37, Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Friday, November 13, 2015 10:08:18 PM Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > >> But as far as I can tell all that is missing are a few small things on > > >> the edges, the core of what the companion app can do is there and > > >> appears > > >> to be working in my minimal testing. > > > > > > Obvious question: Do you have a list of the missing bits? > > > > Sure. > > a) ability to manually add a location. "Create named gps fix here" which > > adds > > a fix with the given name, current location and current time > > b) ability to create a Location Webservice account. My hunch is that we > > should change the way things are currently done and just somehow make this > > work with the cloud service credentials. I'll work on that part as that > > requires changes to our infrastructure > > c) retrieve forgotten id - just like b) I want to rethink the way we do > > this > > currently > > Ok, nothing for me in this list (by the logic of me concentrating on tasks > that need skills not currently in the team, the QML parts more or less for > now).
a) has a UI component... I can certainly try with my AMAZING QML skills to add this and then have you undo the damage :) The other two are indeed things I need to figure out how I want them to work on the back end so that we don't need a UI for any of this and it just works transparently. I'll look into that tonight (unless something else distracts me). > I'll focus on getting the divelist and details reworked (the swipable details > being part of that), restructuring the navigation to make it future proof, > and > then removing everything else from the UI as to only make it show features we > are happy with. I hope that the intersection will already make the companion > app unnecessary, so we can concentrate on just one codebase, otherwise, we'll > re-prioritize these plans to match. This sounds like exactly the right plan. As far as I am concerned no future work on the companion apps should need to happen, all future work should go into Subsurface-mobile /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
