> On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org
>> <mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:37:30 +0000
>> Pedro Neves <nevesdi...@gmail.com <mailto:nevesdi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> Small patch to reflect the need to install qtlocation5-dev on Debian/Ubuntu.
>>>
>>> @Dirk:
>>>
>>> I hope all is correct ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers:
>>>
>>> Pedro
>>
>> The library you want is qtpositioning5-dev on Debian.
>> https://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy-backports/qtlocation-opensource-src
>>
>> <https://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy-backports/qtlocation-opensource-src>
>
> Odd - maybe that's an issue of diverging package names?
> On Ubuntu it definitely is qtlocation5-dev
OK, so qtlocation5-dev depends on qtpositioning5-dev
So is it reasonable to assume that qtlocation5-dev would work, assuming it had
beenback ported to wheezy as well?
Or would it be better to switch all of the dependencies to qtpositioning5 if
that is indeed sufficient to build Subsurface?
/D
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
