I think it would be safer if subsurface version.h is called
subsurface-version.h, just to be on the safe side.

Either way, glad that you found it,  I was hitting my head on the wall
here.
Le 17 déc. 2015 20:47, "Lubomir I. Ivanov" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> On 17 December 2015 at 23:52, Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Lubomir, what's your system? Let me try to compile locally using the same
> > thing as you have.
> >
>
> found it...
> my /lib/libusb/include/libusb-1.0
>
> folder had a "version.h", which was picked instead of the
> subsurface-core/version.h
> that's why the include order mattered.
>
> the file itself should not be where the libusb.h is located. how did i
> miss that.
>
> anyhow, sorry for the spam.
> lubomir
> --
>
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to