On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Salvador Cuñat <[email protected]> wrote: > At the moment, if we have, say, dives ... 100, 101 and 102 and we merge 101 > and > 102, we get a list numbered ... 99, 100, 102. This is, probably, an > undesired behavior. The patch simple chooses lower of both dive numbers > instead > of higher one.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> That said, when you start merging dives, you usually do end up having to renumber subsequent dives anyway, but this is the right thing to do anyway. Linus _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
