> On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Willem Ferguson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 31/01/2016 20:49, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> 1030cb2 is -676 >> 464b88f is -675 >> >> But as Lubomir points out, between different Qt and potentially different >> mobile-components, there is some risk that your builds aren't consistent >> with mine. Especially when it comes to such odd crashes. >> >> I have actually taken a day off from Subsurface yesterday so I'm not 100% >> following what you and Willem are tracking down. I can certainly create >> specific builds if that would help. Which ones do we need? >> >> /D >> > Rick's rationale is to track down the specific patch that causes the crash. > It is later than build 675 and earlier than 689. So I have been running > various builds of Subsurface-mobile, checking which builds run as expected > and which crash.
OK, I'm building all the revisions between 675 and 758 one by one and am putting them all into daily. This will take a while but so will your testing, so I'm pretty sure I'll be faster than you :-) 675 - 679 are already there, a new one is added approximately every minute :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
