On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:53:42 PM JB2Cool wrote: > On 9 February 2016 at 12:48, Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > I'd much rather have something small, stable and high quality than a swiss > army knife that falls apart the moment you look at it. > > There are many areas in subsurface which need improvements, implementing a > dive planner is going to distract from making them work really well.
> So don't implement the dive planning into the subsurface-mobile just yet but > does this really justify the creation of another companion app to perform > the dive planning? That'll then be 3 mobile subsurface apps we have, surely > better to restrict the number of them and eventually (Even if it's a while > out) merge the functionality into a single app. Absolutely, if I ruled the world, everybody would work on one codebase with a common understanding of features and priorities. It's not how open source works, we can provide direction, but people decide themselves whether to work with the team, or alongside it. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
