On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Jan Mulder wrote: > On 09-02-16 15:18, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:58:46AM +0100, Jan Mulder wrote: > >>Completely agree. Thanks again for the testing and for the dilligence to > >>keep the issues reported. I really think that we should try harder to use > >>trac for this as it makes it much easier not to forget things that way. > Fully agree on the trac use. > > I see, however, an issue. Currently there are 110 open tickets, and a quick > scan shows me that this list is definitely not a consolidated list of things > that are still open, requests that never will be implemented, or issues > filed against very old versions. So for the trac-list actually be useful, it > needs to actively maintained, issues assigned, closed when implemented, and > rejected/closed when it will not be implemented. That all might stimulate > the use of trac here.
There are a couple of people actively tracking the bugs. As with everything else it's a function of time. But in cases like this it actually works really well. Simply do a report by component and look at the bugs for Androud Subsurface-mobile app: http://trac.subsurface-divelog.org/report/10?asc=1&page=1 That said, the two bugs that you haven't filed, yet, (buttons in the topbar and offline account switch) should now be fixed - new APK will be up shortly /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
