On 9 February 2016 at 22:51, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:25:04AM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote: > > > A separate Subsurface-planner would be nice as well. Maybe something > > > simple, with just table based input and output, utilizing the powerful > deco > > > planner core that we have. > > > > I created the basics of a table input/output planner ui. I haven't > > submitted it as I really didn't want to distract from getting the first > > mobile release out, and also I haven't had time to work out how to > connect > > it to the core code (which requires me learning qt and c++). I keep > > changing my mind whether the better option is modify the existing c++ > > models to suit qml (and still work for the desktop), or duplicate the > > models. Maybe someone else could sort that out quickly. I think it'd be a > > lot simpler than the existing dive list code. > > I think it would be much smarter to adapt the existing models so they can > work for both UIs. Code duplication just makes things harder to maintain. > > > I'll submit the code *FOR DISCUSSION* when I get a chance. Perhaps > tonight > > au time. > > Cool. > > > It fits into the current mobile app. It could be standalone, but I don't > > see the point, and then it would lose the potential to plan based on gas > > loading from real dives. > > Yeah, I wasn't entirely serious when suggesting a separate app. I just > don't want the distraction from our current goal of releasing a first > version at all. > > With the first beta out I consider the functionality more or less frozen. > I'll add the cylinder editing in the next beta, but other than that...? > Since we will have users coming directly to the mobile version we need to be able to do the following on the mobile version. * Signup and verification of cloud credentials. * Choose between metric or imperial as default units.
> > Everything that's added after today should wait for the next > Subsurface-mobile release. > > > > Many would appreciate an open source alternative to expensive and > > > slightly awkward software like Multideco and Baltic deco planner. > > > > I agree completely. Plus my buddy's version of MultiDeco on his phone has > > started giving odd results and I don't trust it. > > I hear Subsurface dive planner also sometimes gives you "odd" results :-) > > /D > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface > -- //Jocke
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
