On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:16:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mar 13, 2016 8:34 AM, "Dirk Hohndel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This patch doesn't have a commit message and no SOB - was I supposed to > > apply that? > > It was more of an RFC. > > Do people care? Also, do we want to update the virial coefficients to ones > that were can reproduce with the R script? > > I can resend the updated patch with the coefficient updates too. But it's > not like this is important, it's just tying up some loose ends..
So in my mind we have way, way, way over-engineered this. That said, if you go down the WAY WAY WAY over-engineering rat hole, then gosh darn it FINISH IT, my friend. It would be a total shame to not have this completely over-engineered gem be as best over-engineered as we can. So yes, please send the updated script and update the virial coefficients and send the optimization to avoid divisions. Because we can. And we should. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
