> On Apr 18, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> So for the way that /I/ use Subsurface, this is a massive step back.
>
> And while I'm happy to go out of my way and spend hundreds of hours so that
> others can do things the way they want, I draw the line at spending time on
> no longer being able to use Subsurface the way I want to.
>
> At the same time, it stops me (and several people I know) from using
> Subsurface sanely. But I believe we need to separate the dive and dive site
> logic to get rid of the confusion we see /every/ time someone tries to change
> the dive site handling.
So my choices are "make a change that I will hate" or "keep something that some
other people hate"...
Interesting dilemma.
> The second widget could be made pretty seemless (with e.g. keyboard
> navigation, or even something inline), but I think we are stuck if we stick
> with the current UI.
Yeah, we did six versions of the dive site UI. We almost lost Tomaz as a
contributor over this.
I think I know which way this one will go.
/D
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
