> On Apr 18, 2016, at 7:25 AM, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas, > >> On 18.04.2016, at 16:03, Thomas Pfeiffer <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I don't think users would think that if they first choose an existing site >> and >> then change the name, they'd actually change the name of the existing site >> in >> the database, or do you think they would? >> >> Of course then it would still make sense to have an option to actually edit >> existing dive sites, but that could be done elsewhere, since it's not a >> common >> task (or is it?). >> >> If you have already considered and discarded that option before, I'm sorry >> for >> the noise. If not, this may be something to think about? > > > this is pretty much what we currently have. Unfortunately, there is a > complication that that is that a dive site not only has a name but also > coordinates. And the whole discussion revolves around what it means for one > of the fields when one edits the other. And from what I can tell, it would be > easier to unify the subsurface community in a decision of the emacs vs. vi > question than on this.
Absolutely. And the answer is QtCreator. Thanks for asking. To your other point... I think the main mistake was to remove the GPS coordinates from the main screen. If we hadn't done that, almost all confusion could have been avoided. /D
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
