Hi, > Am 02.06.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Lutz Vieweg <[email protected]>: > > This second part has been published by now, see > http://gtuem.praesentiert-ihnen.de/caisson_3-2015.pdf > <http://gtuem.praesentiert-ihnen.de/caisson_3-2015.pdf> > starting at page 6. > > The different time-to-surface values computed by different software/computers > for the same dive using Heliox 80/20 vary from 41 to 528 minutes!
I am not sure I totally agree with the methodology of that article (in particular using unrealistic parameters like the choice of gases and GF 100/100 to exaggerate the differences between the implementations) but I am glad that subsurface lands well in the middle of the realistic implementations. Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
