> On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Marco Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 August 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> Just to make sure I understand this correctly... You are suggesting that I >> shouldn't build Kirigami as a separate library, but that I should include >> the kirigami.pri file from the Subsurface-mobile.pro file? And I assume >> that i then don't need much of what I spent all weekend trying to make >> work? > > ah, if what you have now works, then that's fine :) > was something to try if it wasn't working yet :)
Well, the .pri approach means fewer changes to Subsurface (and Kirigami), so in that sense I think it's preferable. I just need to test if it actually works (it's still early morning here, haven't had time to try it) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
