On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10.11.2016, at 06:05, Darryl H <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fair enough, but then anyone using Subsurface for a mixture of both manual > and computer logged dives (as I am, at least for the early dives) is going > to have statistics like the year's average depth be incorrect. It would make > more sense if profileless dives were simply ignored for that purpose, rather > than entering into the calculation as zero. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Subsurface Divelog" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/subsurface-divelog/F00C201A-392D-46FD-90E1-26BDA1293FDA%40atdotde.de. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > This patch does exactly this. Alternatively, we could make up some average > depth for dives for which we only know the max depth and duration. But > making stuff up is not what we usually do. What do people here thing?
No made up values, please. At least I cannot think of any way to guess sensible average depth based on max depth and duration. One should also note that the year's average depth is actually the average of maximum depths (IIRC). Maybe we should change the title in the yearly statistics to: Maximum Depth (m) Average Minimum Maximum We have been bitten by the definition of average depth before and that is why we have disabled it from the Stats tab. But similar change might be in order to the Stats tab as well. Thoughts/comments? miika _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
