On 9 January 2017 at 04:10, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2017, at 12:28 AM, Miika Turkia <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > The more testing we get before release, the better. Even a small > > variation in steps one does might reveal a bug. (Especially the > > developers tend to do things always the same way, as they know the > > software too well :D) > > That's precisely the problem. Also, multiple platforms / OSs. > We now have one positive report for an Petrel on Fedora. I don't know if > this was with the AppImage or a Fedora build from OBS or something > the tester built themselves (stupidly forgot to ask). > That was built from master. I just tested Petrel 2 download with the beta 2 Appimage, and the beta 2 OBS Fedora 24 build. Both were successful. Note that there is no Fedora 25 repository on the OBS, but the 24 version worked on 25.
> What about other dive computers? > What about other Linux flavors, especially with the AppImage? > What about Mac and Windows. > I also tested on Windows 10, and it worked. > > Testing is actually really hard and most developers massively > under-estimate the complexity and effort that it takes to test something > like Subsurface well. > > /D > > > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
