Willem, > On 01 Feb 2017, at 15:37, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think an easy approach would be as follows: Yes, we only have one set of > cylinders per dive, but you don’t have to use all of them, only those with > corresponding gas switch events are shown on the profile (I guess, people, > please correct me). So when merging a real dive with a planned one, we could > put both lists of cylinders in the dive and only use half of them in the > events of a specific “dive computer”. >
I have just created a pull request on github. Could you please test it this is what you want? Thanks Robert PS: I have not attacked the „spurious gas changes“ problem you also reported, yet.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
