Linus, > On 08 Feb 2017, at 21:31, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yeah, it looked to me that everything that that code was doing was now > handled automatically by the improved cylinder merging code. > > So I _think_ it all works, but somebody who actually uses the planner > should very much check.
from what I see, in the matching you only look at the gas percentages but not at the content (start/end pressures and sizes). In Willem’s case that wouldn’t be good enough. I would say, don’t merge cylinders if both have start and end pressures and they differ. And in merging don’t overwrite valid start/end pressures by zero. Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
