On 10 February 2017 at 18:33, Robert C. Helling <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi, > > > Am 10.02.2017 um 06:26 schrieb Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]>: > > > > So, err, should I, or shouldn't I? The discussion left me thinking that > > VPM-B clearly is even more bogus and weird than I thought before, but I'm > > not sure we came to a conclusion what to do here... > > I vote for taking this patch. If we err we do on the conservative side. > I second that. We should also state in the documentation, and maybe comment in the code, that we reset the crushing pressure between repetitive dives, which is a conservative assumption but some other implementations do not do this. It would be nice to be consistent with other software, but reducing the decompression time for a repetitive dive just seems dangerous. Cheers, Rick
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
