Well that's where it needs a community decision. My view is that we should use GF Hi and GF Lo as that is how they are described in Erik Baker's papers.
As for units, the original paper used 0-1 whereas common use , and in subsurface, is 0-100. I would add % to the preferences comment. Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9184> On 13 Mar 2017, at 05:58, "Martin Měřinský" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 18:44 +0000, John Smith wrote: In planning view, gradient factors are "GF low" and "GF high" and are given % in the pull down. In preferences they are "GFLow" and "GFHigh" and are unit less. Which one is correct? GFLow GFlow GF Low GF low Martin M.
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
