On 16 March 2017 at 19:57, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not sure if everyone who is likely to be interested in this is on the > libdivecomputer mailing list... > Linus, Anton, Lubomir, Robert... if you have comments on the below, please > respond over on > that mailing list (not hear, let's help keep this discussion in one place). >
i'm guilty of not looking much at the libDC tree other than building it and at the usage in Subsurface, so i'm going to keep a low profile on this one. i understand the change, the need for the change and i think that what Jeff suggests seems reasonable in terms of future benefits. (except that (void *) suggestion, if one breaks the ABI might as well provide the correct type information for the content for the stream). ...but Subsurface already has a Bluetooth layer and i'm not sure that Subsurface has much interest in that change as one of the triggers for the change is exactly Bluetooth. if Subsurface would not benefit much from this change then Subsurface can roll with the old API if it also supports the latest added DCs, unless the latest added DC support only works with the new API, in which case Subsurface needs to move to the new API to support new DCs. /random tinkerings lubomir -- P.S. yet to see a dive computer IRL, such mythical devices. _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
