On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:40:10PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote: > On 05-06-17 16:41, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > We learned from HW that this should never be the case with production > > OSTC. Hmm. Not sure what to do here... that's a generic ID for the chip > > they used - not sure if it's smart to assume that's an OSTC. But maybe > > that's what we should do? Or we need another UI to pick the device... > I think we need another UI to pick the device anyhow (unfortunately). For > example, for divers that that use more than one BT dive computer, or in the > special cases that automatically checking of a long list of paired BT > devices fails.
I think I have an idea how to do that, actually... we could create a "virtual" vendor "Paired BT Devices" and then as "products" we could have the paired devices... I'll play with that idea. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
