On 13 June 2017 at 05:28, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:18:57AM +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> > > Change looks reasonable to me. What I don't see is why this would get an > assert. > > Tomaz, any idea? >
the change is not directly related to the assert itself, BTW. i just used the patch medium to report it. might be an old Qt bug. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
