Hello Willem, hallo Robert, Am 13.06.2017 um 20:48 schrieb Willem Ferguson: > On 13/06/2017 09:35, Robert Helling wrote: >> Willem, >> >>> On 13. Jun 2017, at 07:46, Willem Ferguson >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Running on V4.6.4-188-gbe8 on Ubuntu 16.04, there appears to be a >>> problem with representing the VPM-B ceiling on my machine. See >>> attached image. Is this repeatable on other systems? >> >> > I did some experimenting here. If I select Log->Plan from the main > menu and select a VPM algorithm within the planner, then a profile is > shown on the dive plan. If I then select Cancel from the dive plan and > return to the dive log, then a VPM ceiling is shown on the profile, > but this ceiling is probably erroneous because it differs > significantly from that calculated by previous versions of Subsurface. > Kind regards, > willem
Just back from my family holiday... I can reproduce this issue under Windows 10 with a build based on latest master. It behaves exactly as Willem is saying: After Subsurface start the Subsurface generated VPM-B ceiling in the profile for any logged dive is crap. After you once start the planner the result looks different and better but still not 100% sure if it is correct. I somehow have the feeling that the VPM-B calculation is not feed with correct (init) values unless you once start the planner. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Fuchs E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
