> On Jun 29, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 29. Jun 2017, at 22:57, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> BTW: the reason I'm asking this - as I have mentioned before, for me BT >> doesn't seem to work at all on Mac. I just tried with current master and I >> see BT address of 00:00:00:00:00 for all devices that it scans. Not helpful. >> > > upon scanning I also see this (part of the time). Usually waiting a bit > longer shows also the correct address, latest after restarting the scanning. > Maybe we should filter 0 as address as that I guess would never be correct.
That certainly seems reasonable. /D
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
