On 23 August 2017 at 13:40, Salvador Cuñat <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > 2017-08-23 11:55 GMT+02:00 Rick Walsh <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> On 23 Aug. 2017 19:21, "Anton Lundin" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 23 August, 2017 - Rick Walsh wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> ... >> >> > Downloading to my desktop (v4.6.4-737-g5de49401c89c, built with Qt5.7.1 >> > on >> > Fedora 26) also fails now. >> >> > Does anyone have any clue how to fix this? >> >> I don't know if 5.7.1 is modern enough for BT LE stuff on bluez. There's >> a "// HACK ALERT! Qt 5.9 needs this for proper Bluez operation" and such >> which points one towards a modern Qt. >> >> Test with a newer Qt. Newer is better? What could possibly go wrong? >> >> > > On Debian unstable, moving to Qt 5.9 fails (since a week or two) because > distro has moved to openssl 1.1 (as Linus pointed out some time ago). Didn't > try on updated fedora for a while, but it's quite fast adding security > updates. >
ouch, they would need to manually patch their Qt 5.9 build to support openssl 1.1 or users would have to wait for the next Qt release (and Debian needs to include that too) to be able to use Qt with openssl 1.1. like some have pointed out - openssl 1.1 isn't really more secure than the 1.0x series. on the other hand this move might break Qt apps for thousands of people. :facepalm: lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
