> On Nov 2, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Martin Měřinský <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 08:26 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> On Nov 2, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundati >>> on.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Martin Měřinský <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> After selecting dive(s) without location, zomm out to level 0 >>>> (whole world). >>> >>> No. >>> >>> We used to do that, and it's a nightmare. If you walk through dives >>> in a trip where some dives have locations and others don't (which >>> is very common even if you give all your dives locations - think >>> "I'm now downloading new dives"), it's absolutely horrible. >>> >>> It's also horrible if you want to manually give a location. You >>> were just at your previous dive, now you go to the dive you want to >>> give a location to (possibly the same location, and very likely >>> near-by), and now the damn map zooms out to middle of nowhere. >>> >>> DO NOT MOVE/CHANGE THE MAP WHEN A DIVE HAS NO LOCATION. >>> >>> It's really really bad. >> >> I agree with that. If you really feel like you have to do something, >> put an opaque screen above it so it looks disabled or something. But >> don't zoom / move. > > Could be confusing a little bit, because divesite is probably not on > the map shown at the moment. And zoom out for sites without location > wasn't be bad for me. But I have no strong feelings about that.
It is super annoying if you have a sequence of dives with and without GPS info and you scroll through them to find a certain thing. > Now selected divesite has brighter flag. Maybe the difference between > selected and not selected divesite should be a little more visible. That is certainly a valid point - I think the flags are still too similar /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
