On 8 November 2017 at 16:15, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I honestly thought that we already did that. I was wondering if we had a > discussion of this subject on the mailing list but my Google-Fu didn't come > up with anything specifically about this. > To me it seems to make sense that we'd discard sites that aren't connected to > dives. Subsurface is a dive log, not a dive site log. > > And yes, simply not saving them does seem to address all of the issues.
Nothing that could help now but I'm 100% sure that when I updated my logbook with the new XML V2, later I found some ghost sites not linked to dives. At that time I edited my xml by hand before to save it on the cloud. -- Davide https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
