Hi, > On 23. Dec 2017, at 21:17, Stefan Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe Robert and/or Rick could have a look at this as well?
such things tend to be hard to track down. But let’s see. I this is something I introduced recently, my bet would be on 4d605ce51fcb4bbadf83471568d9f315844f904b where I tried to limit the number of replanning that were triggered by UI element changes. Maybe that was a bit too aggressive or with small gradient factors deco is longer and so is deco computation and there is a race condition with some computation that turns replanning off. But tracking race conditions is no fun. Let’s see what the holidays bring (maybe a bit debugging time and motivation. Happy holidays everyone! Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
