On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 20:21, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 04 June, 2018 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > I don't have an outstanding patch from you, so not sure what you are > > referring to. > > There was a diff a while back in this thread, in > [email protected] , which made the code fall > back to the voted/averaged ppo2 instead of reporting individual sensors > if we couldn't find sane calibration values.
Diff is on Github issue too: https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/issues/971#issuecomment-391630681 > > Jef didn't like it, but I think its a step to a better place than where > we're right now, and as far as I've read it, both Davide and Martin who > is affected agrees. > > > Anyway, now when I'm back on solid ground (I still feel the waves in my > legs) I might get around to making up a commit message and formating it > as a patch. > Hi guys, This is really a big blocking issue for me. I lost data for my last 50 dives. I tried to temporary overcome the problem downloading dives with Shearwater desktop and then importing them in Subsurface via XML. Even in this case there are errors: - no pO2 samples - average pO2 completely wrong: graph reports a bottom pO2 of 1,92 bar I updated issue #971 with screenshots Bye -- Davide https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
