Or simply, where a cursor or a mark is placed... Il giorno dom 1 lug 2018 alle ore 22:07 tormento <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> I humbly suggest that the split dive option should be by time and by depth > level, with both asked after selecting one of them and not hardcoded as > SURFACE_THRESHOLD. > > I have attached the dive. It's one I did in very shallow water, half as a > open diver training assistant, the second during a rescue simulation. The > time I'd like it to be splitted is something like 29:30 from the beginning. > > Il giorno dom 1 lug 2018 alle ore 21:50 Linus Torvalds < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 12:06 AM tormento <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Sorry but not working for me. Perhaps I put computer not so shallow to >> recognize as “surface”. >> >> As with a lot of subsurface issues, one of the main complications is >> having the UI integration. >> >> A lot of these things are likely fairly simple to implement, but there >> are people like me who really don't do UI, but could do the "split >> dive" part fairly easily. And there are probably people who could do >> the UI trivially, but then don't feel comfy with the low-level dive >> profile data structures. >> >> Things like the automatic dive splitting by surface time was "easy" to >> do, because it really ended up just needing another menu entry in the >> dive menu. >> >> I do wonder what your dive computer reports the depth as? We consider >> "surface" to be 75 cm (so about 2.5 ft). It's an entirely arbitrary >> depth, going back to 2012 and never tweaked. >> >> So I wonder what depth your dive computer reported for your surface >> time. Maybe we could just tweak that SURFACE_THRESHOLD, and make our >> automatic dive splitting JustWork(tm) for you too. >> >> Linus >> >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
