On 14 July 2018 at 02:52, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 July 2018 at 18:29, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 25 June 2018 at 23:05, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jun 25, 2018, at 10:43 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> got a confirmation today that the only way to communicate with GATT
>>>> services on Windows / Qt (native API, not the the UWP) is to first go
>>>> to the Control Panel and ***manually pair the BLE devices via the
>>>> UI***.
>>>> there could be hacks for that, that we are not aware of, but Google
>>>> shows nothing.
>>>>
>>>> this means that DC users that have not paired their devices will
>>>> experience errors in Subsurface.
>>>>
>>>> if BLE is to be eventually supported on Windows, this has to be
>>>> documented and/or possibly a message has to be shown in the "Download
>>>> from DC" dialog in the lines of "please, pair your DC devices in
>>>> Control Panel first".
>>>
>>
>> so i was finally able to connect the OSTC+ (BLE) on Windows with Qt,
>> but now a Win32 developer introduced new functionality in the windows
>> branch for QtConnectivty and the moment i synced with the remote
>> branch it required me to build against a newer version of qtbase,
>> which completely messed up by Qt build.
>>
>
> i'm able to get the dive download from the OSTC+ on Windows to start
> going but early in the process it fails.
> detailed log here:
> https://pastebin.com/k4fCX13r
>
> is the OSTC+ download currently working on other platforms?
>

added Jan Mulder to CC on the above question.

link for testing my latest test build for BLE on Win32:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zslq3ughx9ciehj/_deploy_win32_ble.zip?dl=0

maybe other DCs work.

testing instructions in this email from before:
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/2018-June/032171.html

lubomir
--
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to