On 29 September 2018 at 01:03, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That looks… “interesting”. > So your code is Qt 5.9.5 based? > We are currently building against Qt 5.10.1 > I guess I’ll need to figure out if this works against Qt 5.10.1 as well or > if we are better off downgrading overall. > Not sure if I want to tackle this for Subsurface 4.8.3 - that sounds like I > might be breaking way too many things. >
i think the code was fine building against 5.9 but they switched to a new Qt feature that broke QtConnectivity against older QtBase and 5.11 was now required. that's the only reason i did that switch. digging for the exact feature...i cannot find it / i don't remember. something else to note here, it seems that Alex hasn't merged the `dev` branch in the `wip/win` branch in a while, so if the build fails for you we need to ping him. > And on the off chance that this does sound even the least bit critical > (because I have been told by others today that I’m a bit grumpy): I am super > happy with your progress there. Lack of BLE support on Windows was a huge > concern for me and this is awesome. We may not get this for 4.8.3, but we > should be able to get “something” out very soon. > as said earlier, credit goes to Linus, as he fixed it by fixing the support for the other DC (was it a Mares?). lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
