On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 15:40, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:34:29PM +0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > According to https://github.com/mxe/mxe/issues/2070 there is at least one > > project that managed to get QtWebKit to build with MXE - but from what I > > can tell this must have been on W64. Which made me wonder if it made sense > > for us to have two Windows binaries... a 32bit binary without BLE support, > > based on Qt 5.9 (just like the last one). And a 64bit binary, hopefully > > with both BLE and QtWebKit support. After all, BLE requires the latest > > Windows 10 and no one in their right mind is running this in 32bit mode, > > right? > > I spoke too soon. I can't get this to work at all, so still no QtWebKit > for Qt 5.10 or later under MXE :-( >
i guess we have the option to wait until Qt and MXE goes back to QtWebKit officially. such a build will have both BLE and QtWebkit for Windows? what i really wanted us to have, even if we don't release official / experimental BLE support for Windows soon, is to have a Windows BLE installer that i can point users to so that they can test their DCs. right now i have to point them either to an old version (was it -46) or to my own build which is super haxored and even lacks QImage support. if -46 is sufficient for this we can continue recommending it. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
