Sorry for top posting.... A quick response from mobile. I think I opt for option b) as well. The new filter is usable but I think it's not ready for release, due to too much open discussion on the exact functionality.
--jan On January 21, 2019 10:54:00 PM GMT+01:00, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: >So there's a bug that makes the Teric fail after a v11 FW update (that >one's totally on me). >Also, the Windows binaries for 4.8.4 (once again - also totally on me) >are >missing hidapi support. >Additionally, there are a few new dive computers supported in >libdivecomputer (which Linus will be merging at some point today). > >Why am I writing this in such a strange way? Because the state of the >filter widget tells me that I should not cut a release based on >master... > >So my options are >(a) wait for the filter to be truly ready >(b) create a 4.8 branch based on 4.8.4 and just add a hand full of >commits > that clearly fix bugs or fall into the list above >(c) create a 4.8 branch based on master, but revert all the filter >changes >(d) something else? > >I'd love to hear some feedback / preferences... on my own I think I'd >lean >towards (b)... > >Thanks > >/D >_______________________________________________ >subsurface mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
