Yes, I think that is a very reasonable scenario and as Linus points out, the original design had that in mind...
/D > On Nov 7, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Richard Houser <r...@divinesymphony.net> wrote: > > Agreed. It's just an arbitrary container. > > Consider the less crazy case of going on a trip with a group near West Palm > Florida for example. They aren't die hard divers, but have 6 dives spread > across a week. It's still a dive trip. > > Then you hear a college buddy is in-state on vacation, and arrange a couple > extra dives in a cave up-state. This is all happening while everyone else is > out doing land based activities. That's also a dive trip, and the two overlap. > > I could even see the case with the above example of a dive being in two > different trips if two groups overlapped at the same dive site, but that's > pushing an edge case.... > > On November 7, 2019 12:40:04 PM EST, Linus Torvalds > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:17 AM Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > > (4) ??? other ideas? > > Stop thinking that dates have anything to do with dive trips. > > A dive is in a trip. A trip is just a container. The date is > completely and utterly irrelevant, and has nothing to do with what > trip a dive is. > > The *only* thing the date is used for trip-wise is the initial > heuristic of which trip to put a dive in (or whether to create a new > trip). Nothing else. > > Anything that believes that trips are anything but collections of > random dives is fundamentally broken. > > Linus > subsurface mailing list > subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface > <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface> > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface