> On May 12, 2020, at 6:38 PM, Hartley Horwitz via subsurface > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's a crazy idea how this could look for example: > > > > The filters are built incrementally, with a drop down menu that allows you > > to add criteria or constraints. Like date range, tags, people, etc > > > > I really like the idea of building the filters incrementally. This style of > user interface is showing up in other tools I use, so I think it will feel > familiar. I also believe most people filter on just one thing most of the > time, then occasionally go for more complex filters with many criteria. At > least that's my pattern of use.
I completely agree with that. Which would make this incremental setup neat. > > once the user picks one, that is added to the list and can be populated. > > In the example the user first added 'date' and then 'tags'. > > The tags one shows the idea of having additional options (all/any/none and > > substr/starts/exact, just like we have today). Using font size and font > > color to make this seem less cluttered. > > Later on, Dirk is asking questions about visualization of the stats. That's > a tough one. I"m not convinced we're a good judge of the average user. For > example, the box & wiskers plots are something I deal with at work, so they > are very familiar and compact. That said, some of my colleagues look at > those things blankly, especially when the distributions are non gaussian. I > don't know how to satisfy all, but I think good filtering and simple > min/mean/max are already valuable. So here you mention min/mean/max - so something like the second graph I posted? Or more like this?
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
