Hi,

> On 24. Sep 2021, at 19:54, Willem Ferguson via subsurface 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I share your point of view because I am an old style underwater still 
> photographer. But every second diver has a Gopro these days and if any of 
> them use Subsurface the facility is probably useful. If I were a videographer 
> I would probably use this option.

yes, I admit, I added that feature. Not only I don’t take underwater videos, I 
don’t take underwater pictures. Actually, to be honest, I should probably say I 
don’t even dive. At least I have not in a year (but I bought an action cam with 
underwater housing last black Friday…).

But I see many people with action cams in the water. And the subtile feature 
mimics a feature of the Paralense cams that are at much higher prize than GoPro 
and its clones. So I thought it will be useful and potentially useful. But yes, 
It has not received much testing. And true, running ffmpeg on the command line 
is not what many Windows uses do on a daily basis. But the file format is 
pretty standard so my assumption is that any decent video editing software will 
be able to read it. But having zero experience with underwater videography, 
editing software or Windows more recent than XP this is admittedly a guess.

Best
Robert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to