On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> wrote: > > I don't suggest waiting for activities to be packaged, and no porting > > should be required: can't you just preinstall a bunch of .xo files? > > Hello, > > we are not going to block on it. The plan is to continue to package > activities and hopefully to do it faster. And at the same time to make > .xo work better on SoaS (also I need to figure out how to best install > .xo from the livecd kickstart, it's pretty painful). Then I'm looking > forward for a good discussion at FUDcon about .xo and normal > distribution packaging. > > That said, unfortunately, the hardest problems are in the system > differences between Fedora and the OLPC images (sugar-evince, csound, > olpcgames problems, tamtam performance hacks, xulrunner patches etc). > > Marco
is there any public discussion (especially after founding SL and targeting to another distros) about packaging sugar activities, maybe using something like autopackage or openpkg fits better then .xo ? _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
