On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:30 -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > I think Bryan's idea is wonderfully practical. What's more, it sounds > easy to achieve. You just need a 'swf-activity' launcher, and a > script to sugarize .SWF files into .xo bundles which launch as > fullscreen activities. that's a great idea
> Building it around Browse is probably a bad idea (re: the .xol > suggestion). What's the point of loading up Firefox just to play a > SWF file? I think Firefox has some advantages because it is the environment that many web developers are familiar. It does add a lot of overhead though. Currently we use Firefox3 to launch Nepal's new flash-based activities. It has some problems > There is still a place for PyGTK. If you want the "real" Sugar, e.g. > collaboration, Journal interaction, the visual theme, etc. stick with > PyGTK. If you want a simple Pashto grammar activity and have Flash > programmers at your disposal, use Flash. There is very much a place for pygtk. It is excellent for developers who have more time on their hands and/or previous experience w/ pygtk. It also provides you w/ better access to the XO hardware. > -Wade -- Bryan W. Berry Technology Director OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel