Hi Erik, we are going to meet during FOSDEM with Gnash's Rob Savoye and I'll have present these questions and suggestions.
Will report back. Regards, Tomeu On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 19:52, Erik Blankinship <er...@mediamods.com> wrote: > I've some follow up thoughts and questions after reading this post from > Tomeu regarding how to best empower web developers and embed gnash/flash. > > http://blog.tomeuvizoso.net/2009/01/embedding-mozilla.html > > What is the best implementation and interface for javascript to talk to > activity subclasses? > > In the past I have created web server instances within my activities. One > of the main benefits of this approach was that javascript authors could work > in a way familiar to them (ajax calls, comet calls, etc. that talk to a > server). The hope was to take advantage of as many existing javascript > libraries as possible. > Others approaches? Benefits? Drawbacks? > > Regardless of implementation, what would a standard interface from > javascript to activity look like? Function-call and primitives as > variables? What would this API need? > Regarding embedding gnash/flash, I would advocate javascript as the pathway > from as2/as3 calls to the activity so that the javascript serves as a > foundation for other plugins. > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
