-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote: >> >>> etoys >> >> This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual >> sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the time to work on >> it because I'm working on the above (and the actual glucose >> packages). > > >What needs to be done there? Can anybody else package this?
Yes, anyone with some interest in .deb packaging can help. Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging "sugar-etoys-activity". Drop an email to debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org . Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking[1] together a sugar activity package until a Debian package can be adopted. More info at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SugarTeam I recommend helping as "upstream" as possible instead of only locally for Ubuntu. YMMV. - Jonas [1] I do not mean to say that Ubuntu packaging in principle is any worse quality than packages adopted from Debian. Just that Ubuntu generally seems to generally favor passing on the grunt work to Debian and treat locally packaged stuff as temporary, i.e. hacks. - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmS84kACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjj7gCeOHNkXx0yX1vSnJx7NDnN36YY 4RgAn3lJ+8ypu6NpxWPU0fiUodTIXuvS =y5x6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel