Different documents and even parts of documents show different ways to run sugar. Some examples:
1. "sugar-jhbuild run" [1]Won't work with up-to-date sugar-jhbuild (I'm using "sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator" instead, but couldn't find it documented anywhere).
2. "<path>/sugar-jhbuild run dbus-launch <path>/sugar-jhbuild/install/bin/sugar-shell" [1]
3. "sugar-emulator" [3] 4. "SUGAR_PROFILE=another_profile sugar-emulator" [3] 5. "sugar-jhbuild shell" + "sugar-emulator" [4] 6. "SUGAR_PROFILE=profile-1 sugar" [5] Which of these methods are supported / supposed to work?The reason I ask is that a bug I'm experiencing [6] only occurs for #6, not for #3. OTOH, "sugar-jhbuild run sugar-emulator" on Ubuntu intrepid is more or less broken because of keyboard issues [7].
While sugar-emulator is useful for debugging / trying out development versions in an environment that somewhat resembles an XO, I'd rather like to run Sugar without the overhead of Xephyr on a "regular" (i.e. non-development) system, i.e. #6 (or rather just "sugar" as SUGAR_PROFILE seems to have a default anyway).
[1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild#Run_Sugar[2] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild#Creating_an_xsession_for_Sugar-jhbuild
[3] http://sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian#Usage [4] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar_on_Gentoo_Linux#Testing_Sugar[5] http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/README
[6] http://bugs.debian.org/512258 [7] http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/342 CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
