-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >This patch seems controversial enough to deserve a public flam^Wreview >before hitting gitorious. > >One possible counterargument for this could be that destabilizing >changes should wait until after 0.84. But changing the resolution >only affects our test environment, not the production environments. >A few of those are *already* using a wide range of display >resolutions. The sooner we shake these bugs out of activities, the >better experience we provide to our users.
>+DEFAULT_WIDTH = 1024 >+DEFAULT_HEIGHT = 768 How about adjusting that patch to keep old values by default, but provide commandline arguments and perhaps let environment variables overrid default too)? That would avoid surprises, while still allow testing alternate sizes without hacking the code. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmdRtwACgkQn7DbMsAkQLj32gCfUzsdCq8EbqwJoobgxzeI2XT9 GxsAoJM8poCYQWWVVfYY6pnn3cdZVDhz =JlK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel