Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: >>> I would however want to do so for Debian. I'll test myself that bundle_id >>> works with 0.82, >> That does not break anything. The underlying hulahop has changed and Browse >> reacted to that - that is why we can not provide the backward compability. > > Simon, > > I also posted the patch for the 0.82 (stable) branch , will you issue > a separate release for that branch too? (the sugar versioning scheme > doesn't help i suspect...) > > If not, Jonas can definitely grab my version of the patch and apply it > on top of the latest Browse he has. > > > m
Yeah, of course I will release that. It is already committed. I just wait for the inline pdf one commit from Sayamindu. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel